Wicker, Smith, O'Hara, McCoy & Ford, P.A.
  • Profile
    • Firm Overview
    • Key Cases
    • Clients
    • Community Involvement
    • Member USLaw
  • Practices
    • Leftsidemenu
      • Aviation
      • Commercial Litigation
      • Construction
      • Family Law
      • Healthcare
      • Mass Torts / Class Action
    • Rightsidemenu
      • Non-profit and Religious Institutions
      • Probate, Tax & Real Estate
      • Products Liability
      • Professional Liability
      • Retail
      • Transportation
  • Professionals
  • Places
  • Perspectives
  • Contact
    • Contact
    • Careers
  • Search
  • Menu
News and Views

WICKER SMITH’S AVIATION PRACTICE TEAM HAS TRIAL COURT’S SUMMARY JUDGMENT RULING AFFIRMED BY THE U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

November 30, 2022     Featured News, Firm Announcements, Firm News by k.bhalai

FORT LAUDERDALE – NOVEMBER 29, 2022 – Wicker Smith’s Aviation practice team, led by Fort Lauderdale partner Christopher Jahr, recently had a trial court’s summary judgment ruling affirmed by the United States Court of Appeals for the 11th Circuit.

The subject case arose from a negligence claim made against our client, a major Atlanta-based airline. Plaintiff sued our client in the United States District Court for the Southern District of Florida, alleging that she suffered a compression fracture in her spine as the result of a hard landing during a 2019 flight from Fort Lauderdale to Raleigh. The defense of this case was initially problematic because Plaintiff produced medical records showing she was diagnosed with a compression fracture of her spine shortly after the landing and she ultimately underwent spinal surgery to correct the condition.

Our aviation-litigation team immediately went to work assembling an excellent team of expert witnesses. The scope of expert testimony included a biomechanical engineer, an orthopedic surgeon, and a piloting expert who worked together to prepare opinion testimony that the impact during the landing was normal and the landing could not have medically caused the claimed injuries. The biomechanical engineer based his analysis, in part, on the lack of any “hard landing” data reported by the aircraft. The lack of “hard landing” data enabled him to conclude the vertical force was less than 2.1 g and within the tolerances of a normal landing. In addition, the orthopedic expert interpreted the MRI taken two (2) weeks after the subject landing to show an “age indeterminate” fracture that was consistent with osteoporosis – and not caused by trauma. Adding to the complexity of this defense was that all of the above experts were retained and prepared in less than thirty days so as to comply with the incredibly tight time limitations provided in the original Trial Order.

After disclosing the above expert opinions, our team moved for summary judgment and argued there was no evidence of a “hard landing” and there was no evidence the alleged “hard landing” caused the claimed injuries. Plaintiff opposed the summary judgment by untimely disclosing a single “piloting expert” and improperly relying upon medical records to establish medical causation. In a series of well-reasoned Court Orders, the trial court granted our motion to strike the Plaintiff’s piloting expert and also granted our motion for summary judgment.

In her appeal, Plaintiff argued that the trial court erred in striking her piloting expert because he was “of the utmost importance” to her case. She also argued the trial court improperly denied her attempt to extend the pre-trial disclosure deadlines. However, the appellate court found these arguments unpersuasive and irrelevant. The appellate court affirmed summary judgment and referenced the arguments in our motion for summary judgment that Plaintiff had failed to disclose or present any admissible evidence that the “hard landing” medically caused her claimed injuries. This opinion from the United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit will now provide helpful legal precedent on these issues moving forward. Congratulations to the Aviation team on this important victory.

For more details, read the full opinion here: Opinion – Affirmance (PDF). Follow Wicker Smith on LinkedIn for more updates on the firm.

Share this entry
  • Share on Facebook
  • Share on Twitter
  • Share on Google+
  • Share on Pinterest
  • Share on Linkedin
  • Share on Tumblr
  • Share by Mail

News Details

Related ProfessionalsChristopher J. Jahr
PracticesAviation
OfficesFort Lauderdale

Recent News

  • WICKER SMITH’S AVIATION PRACTICE TEAM HAS TRIAL COURT’S SUMMARY JUDGMENT RULING AFFIRMED BY THE U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
  • WICKER SMITH NAMED TO 2023 “BEST LAW FIRMS” LIST BY U.S. NEWS – BEST LAWYERS®
  • ORLANDO PARTNER KURT SPENGLER SELECTED TO PANEL OF DISTINGUISHED SPEAKERS FOR UPCOMING ZURICH DEFENSE COUNSEL SUMMIT
  • SEMINAR UPDATE: 2022 WICKER SMITH CLAIMS SEMINAR CANCELED
  • WICKER SMITH ATTORNEYS RECOGNIZED BY BEST LAWYERS IN AMERICA® 2023
WS Stacked Logo White 01
  • Profile
  • Professionals
  • Places
  • Perspectives
  • Contact

Connect with Us   LinkedIn


Member USLaw   USLaw Member

© 2022 Wicker Smith | Attorney Advertising | All Rights Reserved. - powered by Enfold WordPress Theme
  • Privacy Policy
  • Disclaimer
  • Sitemap
  • Careers
  • Contact
WICKER SMITH NAMED TO 2023 “BEST LAW FIRMS” LIST BY U.S. NEWS – BEST ...
Scroll to top

This site uses cookies. By continuing to browse the site, you are agreeing to our use of cookies.

OKLearn more

Cookie and Privacy Settings

How we use cookies

We may request cookies to be set on your device. We use cookies to let us know when you visit our websites, how you interact with us, to enrich your user experience, and to customize your relationship with our website.

Click on the different category headings to find out more. You can also change some of your preferences. Note that blocking some types of cookies may impact your experience on our websites and the services we are able to offer.

Essential Website Cookies

These cookies are strictly necessary to provide you with services available through our website and to use some of its features.

Because these cookies are strictly necessary to deliver the website, you cannot refuse them without impacting how our site functions. You can block or delete them by changing your browser settings and force blocking all cookies on this website.

Google Analytics Cookies

These cookies collect information that is used either in aggregate form to help us understand how our website is being used or how effective our marketing campaigns are, or to help us customize our website and application for you in order to enhance your experience.

If you do not want that we track your visist to our site you can disable tracking in your browser here:

Other external services

We also use different external services like Google Webfonts, Google Maps and external Video providers. Since these providers may collect personal data like your IP address we allow you to block them here. Please be aware that this might heavily reduce the functionality and appearance of our site. Changes will take effect once you reload the page.

Google Webfont Settings:

Google Map Settings:

Vimeo and Youtube video embeds: